Effectiveness of telehealth interventions as a part of secondary prevention in coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

TURAN KAVRADIM S., ÖZER Z., BOZ İ.

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES, cilt.34, sa.3, ss.585-603, 2020 (SSCI) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Derleme
  • Cilt numarası: 34 Sayı: 3
  • Basım Tarihi: 2020
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1111/scs.12785
  • Dergi Adı: SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, Abstracts in Social Gerontology, AgeLine, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Psycinfo, Sociological abstracts, Violence & Abuse Abstracts
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.585-603
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: adherence, coronary disease, nursing, secondary prevention, systematic review and meta-analysis, telehealth, ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL, FOLLOW-UP INTERVENTION, CARDIAC REHABILITATION, MEDICATION ADHERENCE, HEART-DISEASE, PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY, SELF-MANAGEMENT, SMOKING-CESSATION, RISK-FACTORS
  • Akdeniz Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Background Coronary artery disease is one of the most important health problems among heart diseases in the world, with high morbidity and mortality. Lifestyle changes in particular are recommended in the latest guidelines for implementing secondary prevention. Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of telehealth interventions as a part of secondary prevention compared to routine care in those with coronary artery disease. Method The systematic review with meta-analysis was performed in accordance with Cochrane methods. Science Direct, Springer Link, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, MEDLINE, ProQuest and Network Digital Library databases were searched between 2000 and 2018 up to February 2018. The studies chosen conformed to PICOS inclusion and exclusion criteria. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline was used in reporting the study. Results Twenty-four studies with a total of 6773 study participants met the inclusion criteria. It was found that telephone call interventions were the most commonly used, text message interventions came second with seven studies, telephone calls in combination with messages were used in four studies and telemonitoring was used in two studies. Compared to routine care, telehealth interventions had moderate significant effects in reducing waist circumference, total cholesterol and triglyceride, improving medication adherence and physical activity, and had small significant effects in reducing blood pressure and smoking cessation. No significant publication bias was found in the main outcomes. Conclusion Results showed that the telehealth interventions yielded positive outcomes in lifestyle changes for coronary artery disease. Therefore, telehealth interventions can be used for effective secondary prevention by health professionals who care for individuals with coronary artery disease. Additionally, this study will provide guidance for studies on the development of telehealth intervention.