Epidemiology, practice of ventilation and outcome for patients at increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications: LAS VEGAS - an observational study in 29 countries.


Creative Commons License

Kroell W., Metzler H., Struber G., Wegscheider T., Gombotz H., Hiesmayr M., ...Daha Fazla

European journal of anaesthesiology, cilt.34, ss.492-507, 2017 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 34
  • Basım Tarihi: 2017
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1097/eja.0000000000000646
  • Dergi Adı: European journal of anaesthesiology
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.492-507
  • Akdeniz Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

BACKGROUNDLimited information exists about the epidemiology and outcome of surgical patients at increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), and how intraoperative ventilation was managed in these patients.OBJECTIVESTo determine the incidence of surgical patients at increased risk of PPCs, and to compare the intraoperative ventilation management and postoperative outcomes with patients at low risk of PPCs.DESIGNThis was a prospective international 1-week observational study using the Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia risk score' (ARISCAT score) for PPC for risk stratification.PATIENTS AND SETTINGAdult patients requiring intraoperative ventilation during general anaesthesia for surgery in 146 hospitals across 29 countries.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESThe primary outcome was the incidence of patients at increased risk of PPCs based on the ARISCAT score. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative ventilatory management and clinical outcomes.RESULTSA total of 9864 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The incidence of patients at increased risk was 28.4%. The most frequently chosen tidal volume (V-T) size was 500 ml, or 7 to 9mlkg(-1) predicted body weight, slightly lower in patients at increased risk of PPCs. Levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) were slightly higher in patients at increased risk of PPCs, with 14.3% receiving more than 5cmH(2)O PEEP compared with 7.6% in patients at low risk of PPCs (P<0.001). Patients with a predicted preoperative increased risk of PPCs developed PPCs more frequently: 19 versus 7%, relative risk (RR) 3.16 (95% confidence interval 2.76 to 3.61), P<0.001) and had longer hospital stays. The only ventilatory factor associated with the occurrence of PPCs was the peak pressure.CONCLUSIONThe incidence of patients with a predicted increased risk of PPCs is high. A large proportion of patients receive high V-T and low PEEP levels. PPCs occur frequently in patients at increased risk, with worse clinical outcome.TRIAL REGISTRATIONThe study was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT01601223.