Akademik Veri Yönetim Sistemi
Allergologia et Immunopathologia, cilt.53, sa.6, ss.94-101, 2025 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)
The main drawback of hypoallergenic formulas for cow’s milk protein allergy (CMPA) is their low palatability. This study aims to examine the decisions made by mothers of infants diagnosed with CMPA and physicians regarding the taste of extensively hydrolyzed formulas (eHFs), amino acid-based formulas (AAFs), and rice-based formulas. This single-blind, multicenter study was conducted in nine pediatric allergy centers across Türkiye and included 181 pediatricians and 137 mothers of children with CMPA. Seven substitution formulas without added sweeteners or additional flavorings available on the market were tested: Two AAFs (Neocate-Numil®, Alfamino-Nestlé®), one AAF with synbiotics (Pregomin Syneo-Numil®), one AAF specifically designed to meet the nutritional and lifestyle needs of children over 1 year of age (Neocate Junior-Numil®), one synbiotic eHF (Aptamil Pepti Syneo-Numil®), and two rice protein-based formulas (Evolvia RP1-Montero® and Evolvia RP2-Montero®). A sensory evaluation was conducted using a single-blind protocol, following the methodology previously applied in the CONTEST-1 study. Neocate Junior-Numil® was the most preferred product in terms of taste, smell, and appearance, as rated by both mothers and physicians. It was the most preferred formula by both mothers (49.6%) and physicians (62.4%) in terms of taste. Aptamil Pepti Syneo-Numil® ranked second (32.8% for mothers, 42.0% for physicians), followed by Evolvia RP2-Montero® (23.4%) for mothers and Alfamino-Nestle® (22.1%) for physicians. The fact that both mothers and physicians most frequently preferred Neocate Junior-Numil® suggests that sensory characteristics of formulas used in CMPA management—such as taste, smell, and appearance—may play a decisive role in treatment adherence. This finding highlights the importance of considering not only nutritional adequacy but also acceptability when selecting a formula.