Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, cilt.15, sa.4, ss.234-252, 2020 (Hakemli Dergi)
The purpose of this study was to examine the characteristics of coherence and cohesion in the oral
texts of children between the ages of 60 to 72 months. In the study, a survey method in a quantitative
research approach was adopted, and a total of 110 preschoolers were included as participants. The data
of the study were obtained from the oral texts taken from the conversations during the interviews with
the children. Oral texts consisting of at least eight sentences were analyzed by using the Text
Evaluation Form and a rubric. The coherence- and cohesion-related qualities of the spoken texts were
evaluated by two experts. The quantitative data were analyzed through descriptive and inferential
statistics. Descriptive statistics were calculated as frequencies and percentages to present the levels of
the oral texts in terms of cohesion and coherence. In addition, independent sample t-test and one-way
analysis of variance were computed as inferential statistics to determine whether scores for cohesion
and coherence differed significantly based on the child’s gender, socioeconomic status, and the
duration of the early childhood education. First, the results of the analyses revealed that the oral texts
were acceptable and sufficient with respect to the means of cohesion, whereas they were inadequate
and unacceptable in terms of coherence. Second, it was found that the cohesion device that children
were the most successful was the ellipsis. Third, the results also indicated that the levels of cohesion of
the oral texts displayed a significant difference regarding gender and SES, while they did not differ
depending on the duration of preschool education. Moreover, the levels of coherence showed no
significant difference in terms of gender, SES, and the duration of early childhood education. In
conclusion, in the study, it was determined that the oral texts of the children were more appropriate to
the standard language in terms of cohesion compared to coherence.