Akademik Veri Yönetim Sistemi
GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, cilt.30, sa.1, ss.25-32, 2024 (Hakemli Dergi)
OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of prenatal Ultrasonography (USG) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in fetal congenital anomalies. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was conducted on 148 patients who had pre- viously undergone prenatal MRI between January 2013 and May 2023. A total of 185 anomalies in 148 fetuses were evaluated using USG and MRI. The prenatal diagnoses were compared with definitive di- agnoses and were classified as diagnosed, partially correct, questionable, or undiagnosed. In addition, USG and MRI findings were compared in terms of their consistency and consolidation. RESULTS: The postnatal evaluation revealed a total of 185 anomalies in 148 fetuses. USG diagnosed 94% of these anomalies, while MRI diagnosed 95.1% of them. Both USG and fetal MRI were able to di- agnose 91.9% (n=170) of anomalies during the prenatal period. Fetal MRI provided an additional con- tribution to USG in the diagnosis of six anomalies (3.24%). CONCLUSION: In fetuses undergoing detailed ultrasonography and specialized neurosonography by experienced professionals, additional fetal anomalies exclusively detected through MRI are now found to be lower than previously documented. However, fetal MRI is presently employed to offer supplemen- tary information, and advice, and assist in clinical decision-making. In the future, extensive prospective studies with standardized protocols for ultrasound imaging of the fetal brain are necessary to better un- derstand the true role of fetal MRI in cases where fetal neurosonography has already been performed.