Survey of insect growth regulator (IGR) resistance in house flies (Musca domestica L.) from southwestern Turkey


ÇETİN H., Erler F., YANIKOĞLU A.

JOURNAL OF VECTOR ECOLOGY, cilt.34, sa.2, ss.329-337, 2009 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 34 Sayı: 2
  • Basım Tarihi: 2009
  • Doi Numarası: 10.3376/038.034.0220
  • Dergi Adı: JOURNAL OF VECTOR ECOLOGY
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.329-337
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: House fly, insect growth regulator, Musca domestica, resistance, Turkey, JUVENILE-HORMONE ANALOG, CROSS-RESISTANCE, CHITIN SYNTHESIS, CYROMAZINE RESISTANCE, DIPTERA, MUSCIDAE, STRAINS, POPULATIONS, FLY, INHIBITOR
  • Akdeniz Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Insect growth regulators (IGRs) are currently the fastest-growing class of insecticides, and in Turkey these products represent a new approach to pest control. In recent years, several IGRs were also registered for the control of the house fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae), in Turkey. A field survey was conducted in the summers of 2006 and 2007 to evaluate resistance to some agriculturally and medically used IGRs on house flies from livestock farms and garbage dumps in the greenhouse production areas (Merkez, Kumluca, Manavgat, and Serik) of Antalya province (Southwestern Turkey). The results of larval feeding assay with technical diflubenzuron, methoprene, novaluron, pyripoxyfen, and triflumuron indicate that low levels (RF < 10-fold) of resistance to the IGRs exist in the house fly populations from Antalya province. Exceptions, however, were two populations, Guzoren and Toptas, from the Kumluca area which showed moderate resistance to diflubenzuron with 11.8-fold in 2006 and 13.2-fold in 2007, respectively. We found substantial variation in susceptibility of field-collected house fly populations from year to year and from product to product. We generally observed an increase in resistance at many localities sampled from 2006 to 2007. The implications of these results to the future use of IGRs for house fly control are discussed. It will be critically important to continue monitoring efforts so that appropriate steps can be taken if resistance levels start to increase.