LAWMAKING ENGINEERING IN THE DIGITAL AGE: THE INTEGRATED LAW OPTIMIZATION MODEL
THE IMPACT OF TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS ON LAW IN THE DIGITAL AGE AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION, ZOKIR MAMIROVICH ZIKRIYAYEV ZEYNEP ÇELİK GÜLSEVEN, Editör, ALMALYK STATE TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, Olmalik, ss.117-128, 2026
- Yayın Türü: Kitapta Bölüm / Araştırma Kitabı
- Basım Tarihi: 2026
- Doi Numarası: 10.5281/zenodo.22106743
- Yayınevi: ALMALYK STATE TECHNICAL INSTITUTE
- Basıldığı Şehir: Olmalik
- Sayfa Sayıları: ss.117-128
- Editörler: ZOKIR MAMIROVICH ZIKRIYAYEV ZEYNEP ÇELİK GÜLSEVEN, Editör
- Akdeniz Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
Modern legal systems face an unprecedented regulatory burden driven by complex socio-economic relations, technological disruptions, and globalized dynamics. Traditional lawmaking approaches prioritize the internal dogmatic and doctrinal coherence of statutory norms, frequently failing to quantify their long-term economic, social, and operational impacts. To bridge this analytical gap, this article introduces a novel paradigm, termed “lawmaking engineering” that applies scientific, engineering, and digital approaches to the lawmaking process. An optimization model is proposed to translate this paradigm into a systematic framework for lawmaking. First, the critical role of pure sciences, engineering risk analytics, and big data modeling in formulating empirical, data-driven problem definitions during the initial diagnostic phase of the legislative pipeline is inquired into. Second, the integration of the system optimization, operations research, and process management methodologies of industrial engineering with standard Regulatory Impact Assessment practices is explored. Third, exploitation of data analytics and Artificial Intelligence decision support frameworks is anticipated while addressing technological and ethical vulnerabilities, i.e. hallucination and algorithmic bias, with appropriate safeguards. Fourth, ethical and constitutional principles are embedded as binding constraints within the optimization model, establishing a “justice threshold” beyond which efficiency gains cannot justify violations of fundamental rights. This culminates in a theorized four-stage "Integrated Lawmaking Optimization Model (ILOM)" that optimizes statutes concurrently along the axes of operational efficiency and systemic enforceability, constrained only by a justice threshold.