Noise Robustness Evaluation of Time–Frequency Networks (TFNs) for Intelligent Mechanical Fault Diagnosis
Sensors, cilt.26, sa.14, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 26 Sayı: 14
- Basım Tarihi: 2026
- Doi Numarası: 10.3390/s26144492
- Dergi Adı: Sensors
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Compendex, EMBASE, INSPEC, MEDLINE, Directory of Open Access Journals, Academic Search Ultimate (EBSCO), Biomedical Reference Collection: Corporate Edition (EBSCO), Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest)
- Anahtar Kelimeler: deep learning, fault diagnosis, Gaussian noise, impulsive noise, noise robustness, TFN, Time–Frequency Network, vibration analysis
- Akdeniz Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
Vibration-based mechanical fault diagnosis has become a critical research area, mostly driven by the need to improve equipment reliability and reduce unplanned downtime in industrial settings. Time–Frequency Networks (TFNs) have shown strong potential here, combining interpretable time–frequency transformations with deep learning classifiers in a single framework. This work reproduces the original TFN model from the recent literature and evaluates its noise robustness under additive Gaussian noise (10 dB, 0 dB, (Formula presented.) dB SNR) and impulsive noise at the same levels, across five architectures: Backbone CNN, Random CNN, TFN-Chirplet, TFN-Morlet, and a squeeze-and-excitation attention CNN baseline. The evaluation protocol corrects two methodological issues identified during peer review of an earlier version of this work—window-level data leakage between train and test splits, and selection of the best-performing training epoch rather than a fixed final-epoch result—both of which are shown to materially affect reported outcomes. Under the corrected protocol, TFN-Morlet remains the most noise-robust architecture, with only a 19.09% accuracy drop from clean to (Formula presented.) dB AWGN, approximately 15.5 percentage points better than Backbone CNN under the same conditions; an architectural anomaly reported in the earlier version of this study, in which mild noise appeared to improve an unconstrained CNN’s accuracy, was not reproduced under the corrected protocol and is shown to be an artifact of the original methodological issues. Per-class analysis and multi-model confusion matrices further reveal that misclassifications under severe noise are dominated by confusion between the same defect severity at different fault locations, rather than between different severities at the same location as previously reported. These results indicate that time–frequency-aware convolutional kernels improve both classification accuracy and noise resistance under rigorous, leakage-free evaluation, and that this robustness is not replicated by a generic attention mechanism alone.