Comparison of the temporal properties of medium latency responses induced by cortical and peripheral stimulation

Creative Commons License

Goztepe M. B., Ozyurt M. G., Turker K. S., UYSAL H.

JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, cilt.55, 2020 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 55
  • Basım Tarihi: 2020
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2020.102477
  • Dergi Adı: JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, SportDiscus
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Transcranial magnetic stimulation, Medium latency reflex, Motor evoked potential, Spinal circuits, Reflexes, MAGNETIC STIMULATION, STRETCH, REFLEX, MOTONEURONS, SPASTICITY, PROJECTIONS, POTENTIALS, THRESHOLD, LEG
  • Akdeniz Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Sudden foot dorsiflexion lengthens soleus muscle and activates stretch-based spinal reflexes. Dorsiflexion can be triggered by activating tibialis anterior (TA) muscle through peroneal nerve stimulation or transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) which evokes a response in the soleus muscle referred to as Medium Latency Reflex (MLR) or motor-evoked potential-80 (Soleus MEP80), respectively. This study aimed to examine the relationship between these responses in humans. Therefore, latency characteristics and correlation of responses between soleus MEP80 and MLR were investigated. We have also calculated the latencies from the onset of tibialis activity, i.e., subtracting of TA-MEP from MEP80 and TA direct motor response from MLR. We referred to these calculations as Stretch Loop Latency Central (SLLc) for MEP80 and Stretch Loop Latency Peripheral (SLLp) for MLR. The latency of SLLc was found to be 61.4 +/- 5.6 ms which was significantly shorter (P = 0.0259) than SLLp (64.0 +/- 4.2 ms) and these latencies were correlated (P = 0.0045, r = 0.689). The latency of both responses was also found to be inversely related to the response amplitude (P = 0.0121, r = 0.451) probably due to the activation of large motor units. When amplitude differences were corrected, i.e. investigating the responses with similar amplitudes, SLLp, and SLLc latencies found to be similar (P = 0.1317). Due to the identical features of the soleus MEP80 and MLR, we propose that they may both have spinal origins.