Measurement invariance of the Phubbing Scale across 20 countries


BLACHNIO A., PRZEPIORKA A., GORBANIUK O., Bendayan R., McNeill M., ANGELUCI A., ...More

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, vol.56, no.6, pp.885-894, 2021 (SSCI) identifier identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 56 Issue: 6
  • Publication Date: 2021
  • Doi Number: 10.1002/ijop.12790
  • Journal Name: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY
  • Journal Indexes: Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, ASSIA, IBZ Online, Periodicals Index Online, Business Source Elite, Business Source Premier, Child Development & Adolescent Studies, Educational research abstracts (ERA), EMBASE, Linguistics & Language Behavior Abstracts, MEDLINE, MLA - Modern Language Association Database, Psycinfo, Public Affairs Index, SportDiscus
  • Page Numbers: pp.885-894
  • Keywords: Phubbing, Mobile phone addiction, Invariance, Countries, Gender, SMARTPHONE ADDICTION, FACEBOOK INTRUSION, PERSONALITY, CONSEQUENCES, PREDICTORS, MODEL, YOUTH
  • Akdeniz University Affiliated: Yes

Abstract

Mobile phone addiction is a robust phenomenon observed throughout the world. The social aspect of mobile phone use is crucial; therefore, phubbing is a part of the mobile phone addiction phenomenon. Phubbing is defined as ignoring an interlocutor by glancing at one's mobile phone during a face-to-face conversation. The main aim of this study was to investigate how the Phubbing Scale (containing 10 items) might vary across countries, and between genders. Data were collected in 20 countries: Belarus, Brazil, China, Croatia, Ecuador, India, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Pakistan, Poland, Portugal, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Turkey, UK, Ukraine and USA. The mean age across the sample (N = 7696, 65.8% women, 34.2% men) was 25.32 years (SD = 9.50). The cross-cultural invariance of the scale was investigated using multigroup confirmatory factor analyses (MGCFA) as well as the invariance analyses. Additionally, data from each country were assessed individually via confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs). We obtained two factors, based on only eight of the items: (a) communication disturbances and (b) phone obsession. The 8 items Phubbing Scale.