Corneal Epithelial Alterations Associated With Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitor Therapy in Hormone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer


Creative Commons License

Ozbay E. K., Ozturk B., Özbay M. F., Dogan B., Kucuk M. F., Ovali F. S., ...Daha Fazla

American Journal of Ophthalmology, cilt.290, ss.235-245, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 290
  • Basım Tarihi: 2026
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.ajo.2026.06.020
  • Dergi Adı: American Journal of Ophthalmology
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, BIOSIS, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest)
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.235-245
  • Akdeniz Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Importance: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors are standard therapy for hormone receptor–positive (HR+), HER2-negative breast cancer. By blocking the G1/S cell-cycle transition, these agents may impair renewal of the corneal epithelium. No controlled study has systematically evaluated corneal epithelial changes in patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors. Objective: To determine whether CDK4/6 inhibitor–based therapy is associated with cornealepithelial alterations independent of aromatase inhibitor exposure and tear film dysfunction. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective comparative cross-sectional study at a tertiary ophthalmology center. A total of 132 women were enrolled: 45 receiving a CDK4/6 inhibitor plus an aromatase inhibitor (CDKAI group), 44 receiving aromatase inhibitor monotherapy (AI group), and 43 age-matched postmenopausal controls without systemic oncologic therapy. Exposures: CDK4/6 inhibitor (ribociclib, palbociclib, or abemaciclib) combined with an aromatase inhibitor; aromatase inhibitor alone; or no systemic oncologic therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prevalence and severity of punctate epitheliopathy and vortex keratopathy, assessed by a masked ophthalmologist. Secondary outcomes included Schirmer I test, tear film break-up time, and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). Results: PE was present in 44.4% of eyes in the CDKAI group vs 4.7% in the AI group and 2.3% in controls (χ² = 34.31; P < .001). All moderate (13.3%) and severe/complicated (8.9%) PE cases occurred exclusively in the CDKAI group. Vortex keratopathy was observed in 13.3% of CDKAI patients and in none of the other groups (P = .025). Schirmer values, tear film break-up time, and OSDI scores did not differ among groups (all P > .05). Within the CDKAI group, PE was not associated with treatment duration (P = .963) or tear film parameters. Conclusions and Relevance: In this comparative study, CDK4/6 inhibitor–based therapy was associated with significantly higher prevalence and severity of PE and vortex keratopathy, independent of aromatase inhibitor exposure and in the absence of measurable tear film dysfunction. These findings suggest a direct cytostatic effect on the corneal epithelium. Symptom scores were low, although OSDI interpretation was limited by incomplete responses. Proactive corneal surface evaluation with fluorescein staining may be warranted during CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment.