EVALUATION OF PUBLIC HOSPITAL HEALTHCARE WORKERS' VIEWS ON EMPLOYEE PRODUCTIVITY
9. Uluslararası Sağlık Bilimleri ve Yaşam Kongresi, Antalya, Türkiye, 15 - 18 Nisan 2026, ss.244, (Özet Bildiri)
- Yayın Türü: Bildiri / Özet Bildiri
- Basıldığı Şehir: Antalya
- Basıldığı Ülke: Türkiye
- Sayfa Sayıları: ss.244
- Açık Arşiv Koleksiyonu: AVESİS Açık Erişim Koleksiyonu
- Akdeniz Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
Background: Productivity is not limited to a narrow perspective focused solely on increasing
the quantity of physical output; it also represents a holistic approach that focuses on how
effectively organizations utilize their human, process, and information resources. In this
context, productivity includes qualitative factors such as labor efficiency, the quality of
organizational processes, innovation capacity, and the strategic management of human
resources.
Aim: This research was conducted to examine the perceptions of healthcare professionals
working in public hospitals regarding their work productivity, and to determine whether these
perceptions differ according to demographic variables
Methods: This research is a descriptive field study using a survey model. The study population
consisted of healthcare workers (N=201) working at Antalya Kemer State Hospital. Data were
collected through face-to-face questionnaires administered to participants in August,
September, and October 2024. The Endicott Work Productivity Scale was used in this study.
T-tests and ANOVA tests were used to analyze the data.
Results: The mean work productivity score of healthcare workers is 20.422. According to the
analysis results, the mean score of male participants was X̄ = 20.941 (Ss = 12.968), and the
mean score of female participants was X̄ = 20.210 (Ss = 15.009). Although the mean score of
male participants was slightly higher than that of female participants, this difference was not
statistically significant [t(174) = 0.305, p = 0.761] and the effect size was determined to be very
small (d = 0.051). There was no statistically significant difference in work productivity scores
between age groups (F(2, 173) = 0.188, p = 0.829, η² = 0.002). According to the One-Way
ANOVA results based on the education status variable, a statistically significant difference was
observed between the groups in terms of work productivity scores (F(3,172) = 2.953, p = 0.034).
The effect size (η² = 0.049) indicates that the effect of education on work productivity is small;
that is, although the difference in education creates a measurable difference in the scores, this
effect is limited. Post hoc analyses revealed that the average work productivity of master's
degree graduates was significantly higher compared to bachelor's and doctoral degree graduates
(p < 0.05).
Discussion and Conclusion: The research results show that the productivity levels of
healthcare workers are relatively good when the reverse scoring of the scale is considered.
Based on these findings, it is recommended that training programs, ethical leadership practices,
and regular feedback mechanisms aimed at increasing employee productivity in healthcare
institutions be strengthened.