Atıf Formatları
Conventional frontal radiographs compared with frontal radiographs obtained from cone beam computed tomography
  • IEEE
  • ACM
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • MLA
  • Harvard
  • BibTeX

M. Nur Et Al. , "Conventional frontal radiographs compared with frontal radiographs obtained from cone beam computed tomography," ANGLE ORTHODONTIST , vol.82, no.4, pp.579-584, 2012

Nur, M. Et Al. 2012. Conventional frontal radiographs compared with frontal radiographs obtained from cone beam computed tomography. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST , vol.82, no.4 , 579-584.

Nur, M., KAYIPMAZ, S., Bayram, M., Celikoglu, M., Kilkis, D., & SEZGİN, Ö. S., (2012). Conventional frontal radiographs compared with frontal radiographs obtained from cone beam computed tomography. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST , vol.82, no.4, 579-584.

Nur, Metin Et Al. "Conventional frontal radiographs compared with frontal radiographs obtained from cone beam computed tomography," ANGLE ORTHODONTIST , vol.82, no.4, 579-584, 2012

Nur, Metin Et Al. "Conventional frontal radiographs compared with frontal radiographs obtained from cone beam computed tomography." ANGLE ORTHODONTIST , vol.82, no.4, pp.579-584, 2012

Nur, M. Et Al. (2012) . "Conventional frontal radiographs compared with frontal radiographs obtained from cone beam computed tomography." ANGLE ORTHODONTIST , vol.82, no.4, pp.579-584.

@article{article, author={Metin Nur Et Al. }, title={Conventional frontal radiographs compared with frontal radiographs obtained from cone beam computed tomography}, journal={ANGLE ORTHODONTIST}, year=2012, pages={579-584} }