Atıf Formatları
Which is Preferable for Spinal Cord Stimulation: Sensor-Driven Position-Adaptive or Conventional?
  • IEEE
  • ACM
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • MLA
  • Harvard
  • BibTeX

M. AKBAŞ And B. KARSLI, "Which is Preferable for Spinal Cord Stimulation: Sensor-Driven Position-Adaptive or Conventional?," PAIN PRACTICE , vol.19, no.6, pp.678, 2019

AKBAŞ, M. And KARSLI, B. 2019. Which is Preferable for Spinal Cord Stimulation: Sensor-Driven Position-Adaptive or Conventional?. PAIN PRACTICE , vol.19, no.6 , 678.

AKBAŞ, M., & KARSLI, B., (2019). Which is Preferable for Spinal Cord Stimulation: Sensor-Driven Position-Adaptive or Conventional?. PAIN PRACTICE , vol.19, no.6, 678.

AKBAŞ, MERT, And BİLGE KARSLI. "Which is Preferable for Spinal Cord Stimulation: Sensor-Driven Position-Adaptive or Conventional?," PAIN PRACTICE , vol.19, no.6, 678, 2019

AKBAŞ, MERT And KARSLI, BİLGE. "Which is Preferable for Spinal Cord Stimulation: Sensor-Driven Position-Adaptive or Conventional?." PAIN PRACTICE , vol.19, no.6, pp.678, 2019

AKBAŞ, M. And KARSLI, B. (2019) . "Which is Preferable for Spinal Cord Stimulation: Sensor-Driven Position-Adaptive or Conventional?." PAIN PRACTICE , vol.19, no.6, p.678.

@article{article, author={MERT AKBAŞ And author={BİLGE KARSLI}, title={Which is Preferable for Spinal Cord Stimulation: Sensor-Driven Position-Adaptive or Conventional?}, journal={PAIN PRACTICE}, year=2019, pages={678} }